Impromptu meeting of the NY/Berlin Hitchens Fan Club (or Hitchens AND Bust)


Had an impromptu meeting of the Hitchens Fan Club with a fan from Berlin at Cafe Minerva in New York City. Yes, that is a bust of Hitchens along with “Arguably”.  I insisted that each person with comments address the bust directly (OK, kidding, but it’s a fun thought).

From left to right are art dealer Sten Nordenhake from Berlin, Professor Sheldon Krimsky (who is a colleague of Hitchens friend Dan Dennett at Tufts) and Tom Casesa (your blog author).


Professor Krimsky, author of The GMO Deception, with Tom.


Playwright Carolyn Borris-Krimsky with Professor Krimsky, Sten with the Bust!  and filmmaker Hector Carosso. Carosso’s recent film, Kayan Beauties, sheds light on the problem of human trafficking in Burma – well worth checking out.


Moon over Greenwich Avenue

These Guys

Screen Shot 2016-06-07 at 7.04.31 PM


In case you don’t recognize these distinguished men (and woman) of non-faith:

Penn Gillette, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Bill Maher, Lawrence Krauss, HITCH, Sam Harris, Dan Dennett, Richard Dawkins, Ricky Gervais, Ayaan Hirsi Ali.

Great graphic, don’t have source

James Randi, Amazing Skeptic

Screen Shot 2016-05-06 at 3.13.53 PM.png

This is a follow-up to yesterday’s well received post which showed a photo of Christopher ignoring a door sign.

The picture was found on James Randi’s site, accompanying his tribute to Hitchens (reprinted below). Randi is worth knowing about. After a career as a professional magician (The Amazing Randi) he devoted his life to debunking and exposing frauds of all sorts, from  fake spoon bender Uri Geller to the common psychic medium.  At 87, he is retired from his organization, the James Randi Educational Foundation. The JREF no longer sponsors the  $1 million challenge, (money offered to anyone who could prove psychic ability), but continues as a grant making entity.

Check out his de-bunking videos on YouTube, and the documentary An Honest Liar.


We’ve Lost  A Giant

(by James Randi, Dec 11, 2011)

I’m very, very, saddened as I learned that Christopher Hitchens has left us after only 62 years of a brilliant, dedicated life.

Before I type one more word, I’ll point out that those angry, frustrated, hateful, frightened, detractors were simply wrong when they predicted that he would turn to some deity or other before he died; that would not have been the Christopher that I knew, the brave warrior who wielded his pen as a sword and thereby cut such a shining path before him. I’m certain that as he closed his eyes he was aware that he’d done an excellent job, he’d said his piece, he’d reached so many people around the world who needed to know that they were not under the command of any jealous, vengeful, insecure, capricious, cruel, god who created them and then played with them like helpless toys to satisfy divine whims. Christopher was one of my giants…

I’ll miss him, but I’ll try to carry his message to others who’ve not yet heard it, though my words will not read as well, nor will my phrasing of them approach Christopher’s standards. However, I choose to respect him by always referring to him as “Christopher,” since he seriously disliked “Chris.” Please join me in that nicety.

Yes, it could be said that Hitchens was unwise about his heavy smoking and drinking, which may have brought about his too-early demise, but he was a fully mature adult who made those decisions for himself. I have inveighed in the past against those unwise practices because they have cost me other good friends and family, and I myself am certainly not free enough of “sin” to cast any stone in his direction.

As I write this, I’m told that The New York Times has stopped the presses to include Christopher’s obituary on their front page, and I swear that I could hear him guffawing at that. We so much enjoyed his wit and wise words at the The Amaz!ng Meetings he graced with his presence, and we will feel this loss every time we stand before a TAM audience.

Goodbye, Christopher. These tears in my eyes are of pure joy at having known you.

James Randi.

Pre-God Is Not Great

This is an interesting discussion/debate from 2007. God is not Great had not yet been published ( Thomas Paine’s Rights of Man was just about to be released) but you can see him making the arguments he would use in the forthcoming God is Not Great. The topic of this debate was free speech, but it was necessarily about religion, as they were addressing the Salman Rushdie fatwa, the Danish cartoon incident, and other attempts to block free speech. He is at his sharpest. Good Q&A. A great watch.

Slander: Hitchens did not consider converting to Christianity on his deathbed

I didn’t think this post would be necessary, as there’s been a lot of good writing about it, but I want to set the record straight. It concerns Alex Taunton’s new book in which he claims Christopher was considering a deathbed conversion to Christianity. The article below from  Patheos, is a good one and includes a comment from Christopher’s wife, Carol Blue. But first my thoughts:

It is unfortunate that Larry Alex Taunton, in his new book, The Faith of Christopher Hitchens, is claiming that Christopher was considering a deathbed conversion. This is not true as this post, and the article in Patheos will show.  So why did he write it?  It could be that Mr. Taunton wishes it were true, and is projecting.  More likely however, is that the author has a vested interest in claiming a conversion. The organization Mr Taunton founded and is the Executive Director for, The Fixed Point Foundation, states “Our mission is to defend and proclaim the Gospel in the secular marketplace”.  This is not someone who can be objective. Is it coincidence that his claims would also fulfill the mission of his organization? And of course, book sales.

How do we know his claims are not true?  First, Hitchens, on more than one occasion,   warned us that the faithful may try to claim this for him, as they have done throughout history in the case of other non-believers (always, conveniently when the person /victim can not refute the claims).  Second, we know what Hitchens was thinking right up until his death, as he was of sound mind and wrote about his thoughts. These were collected for the book “Mortality“.There is not only, no proclamation of a conversion, but there is not even a whiff of uncertainty in his writing, something I suspect we would find if he was at all unsure of his positions. And third, this article from Patheos discusses the matter and provides a quote from Carol Blue, Christopher’s wife:

Christopher Hitchens Didn’t “Contemplate Conversion” on His Deathbed
April 20, 2016 by Hemant Mehta

A new book by Larry Alex Taunton, called The Faith of Christopher Hitchens, suggests that Hitchens was “contemplating conversion” near the end of his life, though he never actually made that leap:

“I discovered Christopher is not defined by his atheism,” Taunton said. “Atheism is a negative and you can’t build a philosophy around a negative. Christopher was searching for a unifying system of thought. They’re accusing me of saying he converted. I make no such claim. It’s not my claim that Christopher converted, it’s that Christopher was contemplating conversion. I think I substantiate it in the book.“

That’s quite a claim — especially considering that the evidence we’ve seen from Christian media sources suggests that the substantiation boils down to nothing more than “Hitchens was friends with some Christian apologists.”
Who would you trust more? Christian apologists who have everything to gain by spreading a lie that can’t be refuted by the man himself… or his wife, Carol Blue, who was at his side when he died?

When he revealed his sorry physical state, discussion raged over whether he would have a death-bed conversion and embrace religion for solace or salvation.
That never happened, said Ms. Blue.
“He lived by his principles until the end. To be honest, the subject of God didn’t come up.”

Hitchens also addressed the topic during an interview with Anderson Cooper not long before his death:

COOPER: In a moment of doubt… there might be a moment when you want to hedge your bets.
HITCHENS: If that comes, it will be when I am very ill; when I am half demented, either by drugs or by pain. I won’t have control over what I say. I mention this in case you ever hear a rumor later on, because these things happen and the faithful love to spread these rumors. I can’t say that the entity, that by then wouldn’t be me, wouldn’t do such a pathetic thing. But I can tell you that… not when I’m lucid, no. I can be quite sure of that.
COOPER: So if there is some story that on your deathbed–
HITCHENS: –Don’t believe it.

One commenter on a Christian website noted, “If Christopher Hitchens had a deathbed conversion it is because he asked for a priest and converted the priest to atheism.”
That’s clever, but Hitchens actually took it a step further. Among the final thoughts recorded in his book Mortality was this brutal gem:
If I convert it’s because it’s better that a believer dies than an atheist does.
Damn. He wasn’t thinking about becoming a Christian in his final days. He was thinking about the best ways to roast them.
There’s no evidence whatsoever that the author of God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything ever believed God might be great and religion ain’t as bad as I thought.
If you want to give Taunton the benefit of the doubt, it’s that Hitchens spoke about religion so frequently that his conversations about faith led even people close to him to believe he took it seriously.
But that’s being too generous to Taunton, who appears to be cashing in on his friendship with Hitchens by invoking the old Christian trope that assumes decent people who didn’t accept Christ during their lives must surely have accepted Him at the last possible moment.
Hitchens was a lot of things, but shy about his opinions wasn’t one of them. If he had converted, even at the end of his life, he would’ve been shouting about it from the rooftops of the hospital. He would’ve found a way to make sure the world knew about it.
He sure as hell wouldn’t have used Taunton as an intermediary.
***Update***: Kimberly Winston of Religion News Service has some strong reactions to this controversy from people who knew Hitchens well:
Steve Wasserman, who was Hitchens’ friend for 30 years, co-executor of his estate and with Hitchens’ family, at his death, called the book’s claims “petty” and “appalling” when they were read to him.
“I am not in the position to dispute the what Taunton says were private conversations,” he said by phone from New Haven, Conn., where he is executive editor-at-large for Yale University Press. “But I really think it is a shabby business. It reveals a lack of respect. This is not a way to debate Christopher Hitchens’ beliefs — to report unverifiable conversations, which amazingly contradict everything Christopher Hitchens ever said or stood for.”

And Michael Shermer, an atheist and founder of Skeptic magazine, who read the book’s manuscript and liked its description of the friendship between the two men — enough to give it a favorable jacket blurb — said Taunton’s claims of Hitchens’ flirtation with conversion were “exaggerated.”

Yes, Christopher was once a child


Screen Shot 2016-04-20 at 12.09.26 PM
Peter (left) and Christopher Hitchens

It’s hard sometimes to imagine that this man of great mind, wit and humor, who could be quite fierce in a debate, was once an innocent little child. These pictures are from a 2011 Daily Mail article written by Christopher’s brother, Peter. He is a journalist living in London and he generously made time to meet with when I was visiting last June.  I wrote about the experience in a posting, Meeting the Other Hitch.

Screen Shot 2016-04-20 at 12.09.38 PM


Screen Shot 2016-04-20 at 12.15.25 PM.png
The Brothers Hitchens


Screen Shot 2016-04-20 at 12.21.00 PM
Me and Peter in London after patronizing the local Starbucks (June 2015). See posting