I agree with Ayaan. I think the SPLC is off base on this issue. What do you think?
James Randi was the keynote speaker at the 21017 North Eastern Conference on Science & Skepticism held on Friday, June 30th in New York City. I arrived a few minutes early and spoke with him before he took the stage. For anyone not familiar, he is a professional skeptic who has had a long career as a magician and an escape artist. He was a good friend to Issac Asimov, Carl Sagan and Johnny Carson, he inspired Penn & Teller to become magicians, and he was a friend and admirer of Christopher. After Hitch died, he wrote a touching tribute with We’ve Lost A Giant. In 2014 he was the subject of the documentary An Honest Liar. At 88 years of age, he is still going strong.
There is an irony to the Trump supporters cheering the recently signed executive order which ‘promotes religious liberty‘. These people, led by Vice President Pence, believe this country isn’t religious enough, but of course, they mean not Christian enough (their particular faith). The irony is that this group of supporters, flag waving, consider themselves the ‘real Americans’ yet, as Hitchens reminded us frequently, the Founders (would they pass Trump voters’ ‘Real American’ test?) were men of the enlightenment, and they thought enough about the issues of religion and state that they went through a lot of trouble to separate the two. That’s what makes us different than the places from which the Founders fled. Hitchens explains it to the thick Ken Blackwell in this video. Hitchens addresses the topic in Thomas Jefferson: Author of America, and of course with a broader perspective, in God is Not Great.
Trump is likely not interested in religion, but he’s a big fan of throwing bones to his base.
James Randi, a skeptic with an amazing story will be in NYC on June 30th. I already have my ticket. He was a fan of Christopher. See what he wrote when Hitch died in an earlier posting:
Very funny Hitchslap. My favorite part of this program from Australia, Q&A is Hitch’s response to the charge of ‘bagging and smearing’ made by Father Frank Brennen. He makes the accusation at 20:45, and I love the look on Hitch’s face at 21:07 – he is shocked and perhaps perplexed, and is preparing his sharp response which ends at about 21;30. That segment is a good clip, but the whole video is well worth watching from start to finish. He is at his best here.. there are so many smart and responses.
A conversation with Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris. Both good friends of, and carries of the flame for, Hitch and his ideas. Dawkins and Harris were half of the well known Four Horsemen of the Non-Apocalypse (the others being Hitch and Dan Dennett). If you haven’t seen the video, check out the link. It’s a fascinating conversation around Hitch’s dining room table.
Sam Harris makes a good argument – that Hitch may have been willing to overlook Hilary’s shortcomings as a Presidential candidate, providing she planned to take action on the issue that was most important to him at the time: stopping Al Queda and its surrogates (which would have included Isis). This was back in 2007. I think if Hitch were here today, he would also be very concerned about Trump’s attacks on the free press. Let’s remember that Hitch was a First Amendment absolutist. He would not like Trump’s stated goal of making it easier to sue the press.